The Issue: Bill and Hillary Clinton’s closed-door depositions on their connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
It appears that Hillary Clinton felt comfortable in her testimony pointing her finger at President Trump about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein (“ ‘Just typical!’ ” March 3).
How does she explain the portrait Epstein had of her husband Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress and red high heels?
Cecelia Clark
St. Petersburg, Fla.
We really need to cut Bill Clinton some slack over whether he had any association with any women linked to Jeffrey Epstein. He’s married to Hillary, so who could blame him?
Tamara Balin
New Hyde Park
We didn’t learn a whole lot from the videos — but then again, Bill and Hillary weren’t the most forthcoming. Both were kept in check by their attorneys at their sides, interrupting to play referee.
Unfortunately, the committee didn’t ask more questions on the infamous wedding. Imagine your daughter just told you that the wedding list is limited to a “mere” 400 guests, but it so happens Ghislaine Maxwell ends up on the list and secures a nice aisle seat.
Yet Hillary Clinton responded dismissively that Maxwell was a “plus one” and only a “casual acquaintance.” That’s very puzzling for us ordinary folks sitting in the peanut gallery.
Then she calls the deposition “repetitive” and “political theater” — for who?
Ronald G. Frank
West Orange, NJ
For those who were expecting Bill Clinton to spill the beans on President Trump in his deposition, you got nothing in return as Bill said he didn’t see anything.
He also denied any hanky panky on his own part, despite his many flights on Epstein’s private plane, the “Lolita express.” Only Hillary knows for sure — or maybe not.
Ron Zajicek
Cortlandt
I really enjoyed the spectacle of Bill Clinton morphing into Sgt. Schultz of “Hogan Heroes”: “I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing.”
He also denied having “sexual relations” with the mystery hot tub woman in the files. I hope that the questioners were extremely precise in determining what he meant by “sexual relations.”
Didn’t he deny having “sexual relations” with a different woman some time ago? Too clever by half.
Michael Brautigam
Tallinn, Estonia
The Issue: Columbia University’s chief anti-Israel student group posting hate in Farsi on X.
Whoever posted this vile cry, “Death to America” on X must be identified and punished for their evil and seditious statements online (“Columbia’s poison ivy cry,” March 3).
America is at war; our servicemen and women are in harm’s way. If these haters are bringing succor to the enemy, they should be held accountable.
The ayatollah and his henchmen have been instrumental in the deaths of tens of thousands across the Middle East. The world is a better place without them, and America would be a better place without Columbia University Apartheid Divest.
Mel Young
Lawrence
Despite pressure from President Trump, lawsuits by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the withholding of federal funds, Columbia University will not correct the impression that it is obsessed with all things anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist and anti-Israel.
This latest outburst by students posting “Death to America” once again underscores the rank hatred that pervades this once great institution.
Only removing a significant portion of its wannabe-Marxist faculty and student body could engender a tangible correction, and that will never happen. Hence, Columbia will continue to lose what little prestige and reputation it has managed to hang on to.
Mitchell Schwefel
Barnegat, NJ
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
